Sign in
in
   
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."  -Aristotle

About Me

I am a co-founder of Notches, an early stage startup currently based in NYC. We are building a free, open reviews network that anyone can participate in and anyone can build on top of. You can find out more on our official blog.

Read more about my background.

Connect with me on...

Recent Readers

Flickr Photos

 

Warning:

This article is more than 45 days old. Given the speed at which the technology world moves, this post is probably somewhat out of date. Please keep this in mind when reading the post. If this is a tutorial, please check whether you are using the same versions mentioned in the article.

Copyright Exceptions and Defenses in the Digital Age

Fred von Lohmann started the session by presenting his paper, "iPods, Tivo and Fair Use as Innovation Policy" (PDF). The general theme here is that we need to "rethink fair use in the digital age". The premise of his paper was that in some regard these potentially infringing technologies help create a "consumer surplus" which in the long run is actually a "complimentary use" for the content owners. Prof. Gerald Dworkin, the panel moderator, commented that under US law "fair use" equates to "free use". In reality, he said, there are three options for allowing use: allowing this free use, restricting access entirely, and allowing access with a compulsory (paid) license. He seemed to favor this last option - the idea of "compensation without control." Fred seemed to agree, both in the panel and in a side discussion after the panel, but added that without these initial free uses, the technology would likely not exist for the copyright holders to take advantage of such paid uses. I expect we'll hear more about this in the afternoon Grokster panel.

Richard Owens, director of Copyright for WIPO, then presented about limitations and exceptions in WIPO. He also addressed the "fair dealings" exception. Originally this was a purposive test, has now been expanded to "fair dealings in other uses", which isn't quite as broad as fair use but serves a similar function.  In the panel, Mary Wong said that fair dealings is also no longer purpose driven in Singapore. Jule Sigall was pleased to hear that, despite other general perception, others realized that the US was actually one of the more relaxed nations on copyright.

Jule Sigall of the US Copyright office then talked about the relationship between P2P software and fair use, focusing primarily on Fred's "complimentary use" argument. He said there is a "low gravity" in the P2P market - that is, Grokster couldn't charge for its software even if it wanted to, because people would just switch to Kazaa or BearShare. Their goal in the Copyright Office is to raise that bar.


Other sessions:

Only published comments... Apr 01 2005, 07:38 AM by admin

View related posts

 

Linky Links said:

Tim Marman blogged day 2 of the Fordham IP Conference: Constitution and Copyright & Orphan Works Copyright Exceptions and Defenses in the Digital Age Lawmeme contributors James Grimmelman, Katherine McDaniel, David Tannenbaum and Rebecca Bolin, blogged the Yale Global Flow...
April 3, 2005 12:10 PM
 

A Copyfighter's Musings said:

See Tim Marman 's notes from the Fordham IP conference (via INDUCE blog ).
April 6, 2005 9:25 AM
 

Loosely Coupled // Tim Marman's Weblog said:

The paper I mentioned that Fred von Lohmann presented at the Fordham IP conference is available (temporarily,...
April 7, 2005 12:02 PM